Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Sorry I was unclear, I had meant YC didn't fund that idea because it didn't exist until they were already accepted.

I see your point, that the team is the most important part and YC invested in that. My feeling is that YC can be more effective at funding those types of ideas and teams. That the hit rate can be higher by focusing on a different class of idea. Perhaps that means more pivots or different ideas accepted at the start. I'll try to flesh this out more.

P.S. Unrelated, but thank you for sharing your thoughts. I appreciate it



YC's IRR outstrips that of all but a tiny handful of venture funds. (Sequoia, maybe?)

There's always room to improve, but it's likely they are making fewer mistakes than you think.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: