I love it when ideas that have absolutely no chance of adoption get fully thought through anyway. Esperanto is a similar idea for language - too moonshotty, but complete.
Esperanto has actually been criticized for being half baked. There’s this whole website on the subject from a respected expert. In particular it’s really eurocentric.
Rants about Esperanto aren't terribly different from the similar rants one finds about programming languages -- that Go, or Java, or Rust are poorly designed according to whatever criterion the author thinks a language should have. People can agree or disagree with them, but there isn't really an objective way to validate taste in languages whether human or programming.
Esperanto actually is used more than the majority of natural languages on Earth -- there's new books and magazines published in it every year. Yes, it seems like a tiny language compared to English or Chinese, but compared to most Amerind or Paupan languages it's not that tiny.
- A leap week is worse than a leap year. 7 days of birthdays that just don’t exist most years.
- No variety in day of week for your birthday. I know it’s just a cultural thing, but always celebrating a birthday on say a Tuesday sounds depressing to me.
I assume if the entire world is spending billions of dollars reworking culture, infrastructure, software, etc., that swapping to making weekly pay the norm is just a bit of noise in that transition.
I wonder what the gamification effect would be if we paid everything by the second. I think for example transitioning from social support to employment would be more attractive.
Switching everything to any other system all at once would indeed be a huge waste of money.
I've been thinking about alternative calendars recently. This is quite interesting. I wonder if we will ever get to a point that we can have a "base 10" calendar (10 day weeks, 10 months in a year, etc.)
I suppose in-grained traditions that are so hard to change (birthdays, memorials, etc.) make this nigh impossible.
It's more that there are 365¼ days per solar year. and seasons happen at ¼ year intervals.
Any calendar will need need to ensure that those relationships can be represented with only minor but consistent variations, e.g. leap years). Weeks largly stem from there being roughly 28 days in a lunar month.
If we're freeing ourselves from any relation to Earth's physical progression through space, e.g. 24 hr day, ~28 day solar month, or 365¼ day year, there would need to be a compelling reason, e.g. being a largely and widespread spacefaring civilization.
I believe that the closest thing that existed was French Republican calendar [1], accompanied by decimal time [2]. The Swatch Internet Time [3] which uses decimal minute at its base is also worth mentioning - it's almost forgotten nowadays.
The ancient Egyptian calendar had 10 day weeks. And the French revolutionary calendar had something similar. But there's nothing particularly superior about a decimalised calendar.
The thing is though, our current calendar, while maybe not super logical and/or always practical, is not broken in the sense that we're dealing with major unfixable problems. So changing to anything other than what we currently have is creating more issues than it's trying to solve.
And I say that as a purist and nitpicker who loves everything being perfect and organized.
My [alarm] clock displays unix time and a count down in seconds. After a few years I've only partially got used to it. The half alseep version of me does appericate the count down a lot. I just remembered I should experiment counting the seconds of the day.
I remember in 2004 being fascinated with the tons of alternative proposals to the current calendar. Read about them on the kind of sites one can now find using wiby ;)
In my language 'month' and 'moon' are the same word and some people still don't make the connection. I once had someone ask me, when I was talking about some period of x months in antiquity, if they had months (moons) back then.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Esperanto