This was posted here already two days ago as "Show HN". Then, it had no activity but two fake comments (new users who were just created at the same time as OP and their only action was that comment). Two days later this is on front - I hope OP did not use even more fake accounts for vote manipulation this time.
There is a good book on this called “Traction” by Gabriel Weinberg (the founder of DuckDuckGo) where he outlines 19 “channels” for getting traction [1]. I’ve also seen the guy from FPU [2] do a good job at extending this list.
Also, why is nobody focusing on unsuccessful “growth strategies”? I’ve often learned more from people who failed at something and told me 10 things to be aware of vs. someone who succeeded and didn’t recognize the role luck played in their success.
It links to a post by a Roger Swannell, which is actually empty besides a link to a deleted IndieHackers post by Danny Postma.
The summary said they made $15875 in 48h with the 'LandingFolio' product, but checking out the archived page [1] you'll see that they boast the exact same figure for a completely different project: Headlime - a "ProductHunt headline generator", if anything could be more self-accusatory...
Looks like both this site and IndieHackers are being owned by online marketing folks from Bali. And I get the feeling this site itself is an attempt at building a mailing list. Kinda depressing.
Hallo! That's awkward, was just playing off the stereotype. I owe you an apology then, didn't consider that possibility and also got the purpose of Headlime wrong.
This is a nice start, but I think you should also try to summarize them all. I did this with acquisition channels from reading 482 founder interviews [1]. The thing is, not many people have 20+ hours to spend reading through these articles.
Also, some categories are overlapping (AppSumo & Lifetime deals, for example, isn't AppSumo a lifetime deals website)?
I up vote that. Just like there was real estate investing advice to go and visit 100 units firs and then buy your first one. Now you are talking about serious time investment before doing anything.
I think law of diminishing returns hits after around 20 units, because you still will buy something with issues, there are no units without some kind of issues. The same with going through all those articles. Summary would help or just not going through all of them.
First few articles I checked - all are about SaaS businesses. As a co-owner of a small comoany that builds embedded hardware devices, I’d like to see something that isn’t SaaS.
Yes this is one of those slightly annoying biases on HN. 90% of the time Product = SaaS. I'd like to hear some stories from folks who have adapted the techniques from this space to work in other markets. Iterating on hardware, embedded software, small number but high value customer markets etc.
It's either about growing thunts or about growth of unts.
Names made out of two words overlapping with a single letter are next to impossible to pull off. They are confusing at best and comical at worst. They might be memorable because of that, but ultimately they leave a negative impression.
Yeah, especially if you end up not actually building the product as it was in the video.
> Showing a “fake” video is powerful for sharing a vision and testing if there is a need for a solution. On the other hand, if the video is too ambitious, people will take it as a norm and will base their expectations on the video. If the real product doesn’t match the video afterward, they will probably be unsatisfied because the product is incomplete.
> This thing happened to me when I had a call with a user during beta testing. She expected that the complete product should work as it was on the video.
On one hand, it's nice to be able to gauge the interest of something before going ahead and building it, but it is borderline fraud if you show something that is not the real thing, and launch something that doesn't work the same way. That's just selling smoke and mirrors.
Offtopic, but I found this interesting tidbit from the how to get on hn frontpage article:
To get to the front page, you only need 5 or 6 upvotes, within the first five to ten minutes
Is hn really this easy to game? I wonder what all has changed on the backend since 2013... I'm sure quite a bit, given the increased presents of sockpuppetry/bots on the net.
edit: A quote of dang that evokes great irony given the source:
Articles that try to make a system out of how they succeeded on HN always miss this point.
This site offers a quick summary of the major points mentioned in an article that might take you 10 mins to read. And also it curates all business articles written by founders on one site.
It seems a lot of these ideas are marketing tools. Like email distribution mailing lists. I guess something like Constant Contact or SurveyMonkey doesn’t really have a monopoly on such services for small to medium businesses, that you can build your own little marketing platform to compete with them.
Tldr for business strategies wouldn't work for anyone.. strategies must be read in-depth and a lot of it. I wouldn't scratch the surface for strategies.
