I find it interesting how definitions of words drift away from their original meaning.
> is becoming less Unix-y every year
And the examples given are: no package manager, outdates packages, not open free software
Doesn't this exactly describe the original UNIX OSs? Solaris, IRIX, HP-UX and so on?
It sounds to me like a self fulfilling prophecy - he models his expectations on a modern Linux or BSD distribution, and of course at the end they will match what he wants.
> is becoming less Unix-y every year
And the examples given are: no package manager, outdates packages, not open free software
Doesn't this exactly describe the original UNIX OSs? Solaris, IRIX, HP-UX and so on?
It sounds to me like a self fulfilling prophecy - he models his expectations on a modern Linux or BSD distribution, and of course at the end they will match what he wants.