This is a risk, but it's exposing vulnerabilities is always preferable to leaving them in place.
> Or of intentinally buggy patches making it into the wild and being exploited?
There was no real risk of this. They specifically did not allow it to make its way into real releases.
If they had allowed it into actual releases, I would have a serious problem with that.
But I'd argue it is his own fault to use unsupported patches.
This is a risk, but it's exposing vulnerabilities is always preferable to leaving them in place.
> Or of intentinally buggy patches making it into the wild and being exploited?
There was no real risk of this. They specifically did not allow it to make its way into real releases.
If they had allowed it into actual releases, I would have a serious problem with that.