I think it's a bad idea to name your project after a very, very popular childrens' character and then go 1 step further and use the same color scheme for your page.
My understanding of copyright laws is that they only apply when the term is being used in the same space as another copyright. So if I made another cartoon character named tigger that would be illegal, but creating something completely separate (especially something like OS software where I'm not really selling anything) the copyright doesn't really apply. I'm gathering from HN that this is an incorrect interpretation, can anyone explain it to me?
Consider: even if your interpretation were legally correct, what matters is your ability to convince a court to say so when Disney sues you.
That's probably an enormous expense that you'd be better off avoiding altogether by changing the name. Rebranding is also a lot easier now than once you've grown large enough to have shown up on Disney's radar.
If it has potential to cause customer confusion, it might be a trademark violation. A company is required to defend their trademarked terms, otherwise they may become generic terms.
(Standard I Am Not a Lawyer disclaimer. Go talk to a real one if you're worried.)
Definitely legitimate concerns. It grew out of reversing the word git since it's git integrated task management and adding an extra ger. I'll definitely think about changing it - maybe shorten it to tig?
Searching is a serious consideration, but I think most people will search for something like 'tigger task manager' or 'tigger cli'. There's enough differentiation between this app and the children's character.
On the other end of the spectrum is 'Numbers', Apple's spreadsheet app. Try Googling for help with that one. Same thing with 'Pages'.
If you need help managing you animated big cat project with pooh and eeyore thru Tigger, then you might be in trouble.
1, It's going to incur wrath.
2, It's really, really hard to search for.