Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

And, let's be clear, Google's ability to enact change is a result of their pervasive influence over the internet.

It took _years_ for XMLHTTPRequest to become a dominant influence on site design. Google can push new standard changes in fraction of the time because _their services demand it_.

> Even webapps, which are more sensitive to browser environments due to their heavy use of JS, should not stop working on an older browser just because a newer version appeared

Those are vendor-bound apps.

They're Google Chrome Apps, not web apps.



Well, it's not like the entire web community haven't warned about it for the last 10 years.

At this point, what can we do?


10? This was a problem even before 2001, which is when Internet Explorer 6 was released which (unfortunately) quickly became the Internet. Things weren't so multi-platform back then so swaths of the Internet became inaccessible unless you were using IE6 on Windows. Things are a bit different these days with smartphones and Apple's viability, but the landscape is starting to look strangely familiar.


Many have warned, most have not understood or unfortunately cared enough to listen. Now we are fighting the uphill battle for it.


One thing could be to define layered standards for various use cases.

Like the archiving standard for PDF. Perhaps a formalized version of “graceful degradation” if you will with a known set of target.

One target could be a self contained, script-less, bundle f.ex.


Test everything in w3m, netsurf and other niche browsers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: