Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

>I'm not sure why they couldn't have been a bit more aggressive about monetization from the start?

I'm not sure there is that much money in running a glorified specialized S3. Charging for disk space is terrible - the people who have money would probably just setup a private repo on S3 where it's cheaper and the people who don't aren't going to pay you.

For the amount of money they raised I don't think that would have been a convincing story to tell.



Ofcourse there's money. Look at Dropbox, and the like.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: