Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm curious about the same thing.. I use a deadletter queue in sqs and even sns and here I can see an archiver but it's not clear if I need to rollout my own deadletter behaviour here.. not sure I would be too confident in it either..

A nice novel project here but I'm a bit skeptical of its application for me at least.



pgmq.archive() gives us an API to retain messages on your queue, its an alternative to pgmq.delete(). For me as a long-time Redis user, message retention was always important and was always extra work to implement.

DLQ isn't a built-in feature to PGMQ yet. We run PGMQ our SaaS at Tembo.io, and the way we implement the DLQ is by checking the message's read_ct value. When it exceeds some value, we send the message to another queue rather than processing it. Successfully processed messages end up getting pgmq.archive()'d.

Soon, we will be integrating https://github.com/tembo-io/pg_tier into pgmq so that the archive table is put directly into cloud storage/S3.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: