Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's also got an infinitely better reputation since it's arguably not social media, but just a solid instant messenger.

I was personally very concerned when they acquired it, but went from a begrudging user (it was the de facto standard in the country I was living in at the time) to an excited one (Facebook/Meta added end-to-end encryption, multi-device capability, device migration etc.)



If it's E2EE, can you explain how a new device is able to read the messages after logging in?

In other words: Facebook has a copy of the decryption key.


What do you mean by “read the messages”? WhatsApp doesn’t have a server-side message archive.

If you mean messages pending delivery: A newly logged in device can request the sender to resend pending messages under its new key.


> infinitely better reputation

You’ve clearly not seen it enshittify:

* More UI space devoted to brands (the Updates tab

* Communities UX is, uh, suboptimal

* Brands / business accounts can message you with no opt out, you can block a chat after the fact but won’t stop them from messaging you from another account.

These made the news in WhatsApp’s favourite testbed market[1], but if you think it’s not coming to other markets…

Anyhow, tl;dr — WhatsApp’s no longer in the “put users first” phase, it’s in the “monetize” phase of Facebook Product Management.

As a person who paid for WhatsApp pre-Facebook, that does make me sad.

[1] https://techcrunch.com/2022/10/10/in-india-businesses-are-in...


I use it many times per day as my primary means of communication outside work, and while it’s not perfect, I prefer it over all the alternatives.

But yeah, it’s “done” in many ways, and idle product managers and business developers are rarely a good thing for a product.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: