Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It's a shame that regular expressions are so often associated with Perl, as though they're a single topic. It's like speaking of astronomy and astrology in the same breath.


"so often"? Really? That must be a rather particular age bracket, as newer programmers probably don't know Perl at all (apart from its reputation), and the old Unix-heads know that Perl itself didn't really invent them (or basically anything, as Larry Wall would be the first to admit).

Sure, "Perl compatible" is a pretty common moniker (as in e.g. the "PCRE" library), as the POSIX (or original grep/sed) implementations are a bit anemic.

And I don't think any of them deserves to be compared with astrology, but don't particularly care to get into that argument again. About as worthless as vim/emacs/IDE discussions.


> "so often"? Really?

The relationship with Perl was a point made in the linked article. I personally don't use Perl any more, but I certainly use regular expressions.

> And I don't think any of them deserves to be compared with astrology ...

No, that wasn't meant as an analogy, just an example of contrasting entities that are sometimes confused.

> About as worthless as vim/emacs/IDE discussions.

Complete agreement.


"It's like speaking of astronomy and astrology in the same breath."

Hmm... which is which?


Well, let's just say they're different. Also, I've been told there are ten astrologers for every astronomer. :)


An astrologer has a question about stars. He says: "I know, I'll ask an astronomer." Now he has two problems.

Sigh...




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: