I disagree; I find the 'pure data' of this much more compelling than some arbitrary speculation about the meaning of the results.
For example, you could speculate that the sentiment analysis shows points of tension and peace in the story, and investigate that hypothesis... but is writing a blog about that, what situations it works in, and what situations it doesn't work in and coming up with a 'well, maybe...' kind of result what interesting? Not to me.
...but providing me with the tools to investigate that myself?
This is not really "pure" data as there could be tons of other analysis done on the text that one can do and you do not get the raw results, and the tools to get the data and do further analysis are not provided (AFAIK). Why did the author just limit itself to those, or why did those matter more than the other ? What is the purpose of getting the data in the first place? Usually getting data is a mean to answer a question, you do not generate data just for the purpose of the data itself. Hence my "so what" question.
For example, you could speculate that the sentiment analysis shows points of tension and peace in the story, and investigate that hypothesis... but is writing a blog about that, what situations it works in, and what situations it doesn't work in and coming up with a 'well, maybe...' kind of result what interesting? Not to me.
...but providing me with the tools to investigate that myself?
Awesome!