But the GP's point seems to be that this seems to turn into
"cryptography we, as a state actor, can win against in a cyberwar, but which ultimately will end up being exploited at home as well, since we're all using the same partially broken code base"
"cryptography we, as a state actor, can win against in a cyberwar, but which ultimately will end up being exploited at home as well, since we're all using the same partially broken code base"