Firefox has the code that secretly sends a hash of every file you download, with your IP and computer fingerprint, to Google for "verification". I only found out after a post about it here on HN.
But I'm interested, what Firefox extensions are good for privacy?
RequestPolicy Continued to control third-party requests
NoScript for selectively allowing first-party JS, and keeping third-party scripts blocked when other third-party requests are allowed through RequestPolicy, and for its other always-on features like XSS protection, permanently forcing encryption for cookies set over HTTPS, etc.
µMatrix has apparently been available for Firefox for a few months now, and is probably a viable substitute for RequestPolicy, but not a complete replacement for NoScript.
It sends a hash of the file to Google with your IP/print. Worded like it's anonymous and one way, it's not. The hash is unique to the file, if your file-hash database is large enough (like Googles) you can cross reference to get the details of the original file. From this hash, you can then see the exact file the person is downloading. Great if you want to make a list of who is downloading an unallowed file, like say, a list of missing Chinese citizens or anything from wleaks.
Only if it's signed by a known good publisher. Is that file you downloaded from Github signed by a known good publisher? Nope, then it's getting sent to Google for logging. Oh, it was a list of detained journalists? Well, no more gov contract work for you and you'll never know why.
No, the metadata means the URL (not hashed). The protocol is linked from the page you posted. It's clear as day, and the only person who would be misled is somebody who didn't read the page at all and claimed it said things it doesn't say.
I'd suggest it's purposefully obfuscated. It's certainly not clear this is being done and many users are surprised it exists. Such a possibility would be in line with Mozillas recent actions and allegations made against them.